Level | Rating | Percentiles | |
---|---|---|---|
Diamond | 900+ | 99th | |
Platinum | 800-899 | 95th-98th | |
Gold | 700-799 | 81st-94th | |
Silver | 600-699 | 60th-80th | |
Bronze | 0-599 | 0-59th |
Fantasy | Rank | Matchup | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pos | Offense | Action | Proj Pts | % Start Trend | Proj | Rating | Comment | |
QB | 50.21 | 2% (–) | 68 | Bill defense played poorly last week and Tannehill has been solid the last two weeks, but he does need WR Bess to have best chance. | ||||
QB | 57.79 | 25% (-11) | 31 | Struggling with accuracy right not and the Rams giving up 3rd-fewest PPG to QBs last 5 weeks, so hardly a strong play. | ||||
WR | 9.23 | 16% (-3) | 169 | Had 5 targets last week but didn't catch a pass, which is worrisome. | ||||
WR | 17.49 | 89% (-3) | 54 | Oddly unproductive but 60 yards on 5 targets last week is decent, but should produce more in a shootout. | ||||
WR | 18.60 | 53% (+10) | 42 | No way Pats have to throw it as much as they did last week, but still good matchup and he's coming on very strong. | ||||
RB | 18.34 | 91% (-2) | 19 | Last week's 12 touches were a debacle but at least the matchup is solid at home. | ||||
RB | 20.53 | 99% (–) | 10 | Ran very well last week and Vikes giving up 11th-most PPG to RBs the last 5 weeks, so start him. | ||||
RB | 16.53 | 88% (-4) | 25 | Could come crashing down to earth if he doesn't start as Broncos are giving up the fewest FPG to RBs over the last five weeks, but he is a touchdown machine. | ||||
TE | 16.56 | 95% (-1) | 45 | Should've scored last week and a solid matchup as Dallas give up the 3rd-most FPG to TEs over the last five weeks. | ||||
W/T | 23.91 | 98% (–) | 21 | Caught only 1 pass against them earlier this year but it was for a touchdown, and he's someone you never sit. | ||||
W/R | 0.00 | 5% (–) | 2529 | |||||
W/R/T | 3.92 | 3% (–) | 2176 | |||||
Q/W/R/T | 13.18 | 82% (-3) | 57 | Packers are actually giving up the 2nd-most FPG to RBs over the last five weeks, but the numbers are deceiving, so some downside on the road. | ||||
BN | 0.00 | 25% (-1) | 2473 | Unlikely to play this week. | ||||
BN | 1.11 | 2% (–) | 2554 | |||||
BN | 7.58 | 26% (+13) | 172 | Big game last week with 10 targets and could be active with Smith's status in doubt, so solid option. | ||||
BN | 4.92 | 4% (–) | 218 | Played only 6 snaps last week, but he could always score, not that you can use him. | ||||
BN | 5.85 | 1% (–) | 246 | Played a solid 40 snaps last week and active with 6 targets, so you could do worse. |
Fantasy | Rank | Matchup | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pos | Kickers | Action | Proj Pts | % Start Trend | Proj | Rating | Comment | |
K | 7.42 | 55% (–) | 230 | He's now missed four field goals in his last four games but still putting up good numbers. |
Fantasy | Rank | Matchup | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pos | Defense/Special Teams | Action | Proj Pts | % Start Trend | Proj | Rating | Comment | |
DEF | Pittsburgh - DEF
| 22.51 | 50% (-2) | 264 | Dalton is struggling now but did next to nothing against them earlier this year, as well as nothing last week. | |||
DEF | Philadelphia - DEF
| 24.92 | 17% (–) | 257 | Only 2 sacks against them earlier this year and Redskin giving up the 3rd-fewest FPG to D/STs over the last five weeks. |